Interview Answers
Your Interview Answers & Questions Resource


How is it that one of the tinhorn leaders of the country south of us – and he’s no friend of the US can be so?

Question by Wally kurtzwild: How is it that one of the tinhorn leaders of the country south of us – and he’s no friend of the US can be so?
right and our president and Ca leeeeeeee for ni a’s ignorant governor are so Wrong?

Mexico’s president opposes marijuana legalization

Prop. 19, the California measure to legalize pot, would undercut Mexico’s fight against drug cartels, President Felipe Calderon says. He calls on the Obama administration to oppose the measure.

October 09, 2010|By Ken Ellingwood and Richard Marosi, Los Angeles Times
Los Angeles Times

Reporting from Mexico City and Tijuana — Mexican President Felipe Calderon strongly opposes the California ballot measure that would legalize small amounts of marijuana, saying it reflects softening attitudes toward drug consumption in the U.S. that are undercutting efforts to control organized crime groups in Mexico.

Calderon, in an interview in Tijuana, said he was disappointed that the U.S. federal government, which for years has pushed Mexico to crack down on drug traffickers, has not done more to oppose the measure.

“I think they have very little moral authority to condemn Mexican farmers who out of hunger are planting marijuana to feed the insatiable [U.S.] appetite for drugs,” he said Thursday.

California’s Proposition 19 could have enormous implications for Mexico. It has triggered sharp debates between advocates who say passage could help stop the Latin nation’s 4-year-old drug war that has left 30,000 people dead and critics who say cartels will continue their bloody turf battles over the smuggling of other drugs such as cocaine.

A growing number of Mexican political figures, including some in Calderon’s conservative National Action Party, say it is time to end — or at least consider ending — what they describe as a failed prohibitionist strategy against narcotics.

Calderon’s predecessor, Vicente Fox, has made headlines by calling for legalization and regulation of all drugs as the best way to cripple the drug cartels economically. Fox recently said passage of Proposition 19 would be a “great step forward” and could “open the door to these ideas for us.”

The drug issue has for decades been a source of bilateral tensions, with U.S. counternarcotics officials calling for tougher actions against traffickers and Mexico casting blame on users in the United States, which is also a leading source of cartel weapons.

Mexico decriminalized possession of small quantities of narcotics last year, but the sale and cultivation of marijuana are still prohibited. California’s proposed law would not only legalize small amounts of marijuana, but also make it possible for cities and counties to approve commercial growing and sales of the drug.

Legalization advocates say passage of the California measure could pave the way for a peaceful end to Mexico’s drug violence by depriving its cartels of billions of dollars in profits and the weapons that that kind of money buys. They say California’s share of the overall U.S. marijuana market is big enough to affect overall exports of Mexican pot, though past estimates of the size of the underground market are unreliable.

If Californians have ready access to legal marijuana, legalization advocates argue, it also would be difficult to justify a bloody government crackdown on traffickers.

“People in California will be in their supermarkets and their Walmarts with their legal pot, and down here we’ll be killing each other,” said Ruben Aguilar, a former government spokesman under Fox. “Things will have to change here. It makes no sense for us to keep killing.”

But the legalization measure would not, for now, affect the status of Mexico’s other leading exports to the United States: cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine.

Skeptics say that the violent jostling between rival traffickers over turf would continue, even if marijuana is legal in California. Much of the bloodiest fighting has been over cocaine-trafficking corridors into the United States and control over local drug markets, such as in the border city of Ciudad Juarez.

Critics also argue that even if legalization north of the border crimped drug profits, that wouldn’t hobble Mexican cartels because they have branched into numerous other criminal enterprises in recent years, including kidnapping, extortion, migrant smuggling and selling pirated goods.

ken.ellingwood@latimes.com

richard.marosi@latimes.com

Ellingwood reported from Mexico City and Marosi from Tijuana. Times staff writer John Hoeffel in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/oct/09/world/la-fg-mexico-calderon-prop19-20101009

Best answer:

Answer by UNsuspendable
I am going to vote YES ON 19

and no government bureaucrat can do anything about it

you got that, bub

Give your answer to this question below!

Why would my husband turn down the woman he had an affair with? When he’s recently been stalking her?

Question by Lila: Why would my husband turn down the woman he had an affair with? When he’s recently been stalking her?
* I asked this last night but removed it, as a few women called the OW names, which TBH is neither here nor there to me, but does not really help my situation.

This is a complex situation.

I DO NOT BELIEVE MY HUSBAND IS A CHEATER BY NATURE, NOR OPPORTUNISTIC. He’s not a Tiger Woods type, out on the prowl, hunting women.

THAT SAID he had a 11-month affair in 2008 and 2009. He did not confess either, I found out by emails and texts between the pair. I also know he BEGGED her not to confirm it to me, and left her a “DON’T TELL MY WIFE, TELL HER WE WERE JUST JOKING” voicemail, which the woman played to me.

I stayed with him and he cut her off. I then found out that he was still trying to see her. She called me over the summer and told me. I confronted him and he said SHE was chasing HIM.

She then sent me an email which I could not deny (about him chasing her) and I turned to medication.

She also had a court injunction placed on him for harassment because I tried (and failed) to get one on her.

I recently found out he’d been waiting for her just before the December holidays, to ask why she got the law involved, and she was like “umm – your WIFE started it!”

4 weeks later he waited for her AGAIN and this time ran upto her and told her he was disillusioned with me and our marriage, and to “keep me in mind”. They talked for 30 mins.

She thought this was a green light and they met a few days later but he told her he was not leaving me, and she “must have misheard” him. He said he was not angry anymore (about the injunction) but asked her to move on without him.

She then sent him a note to say “why would you say I misheard you when you know damn well what you said to me? Call me if you change your mind. I’m leaving my job so you won’t see me around again!”

He has not responded to this as far as I know, and I think I’m right in this.

Why would he not reply to her? Is he biding his time? But if she’s moving next week, why is he not hounding her before he never sees her again?

In the past he HAS recontacted her even after telling her to move on, but has the injunction finally put him off her? He can’t have loved her that much for that to have killed his feelings?

Why would he stalk her only to tell her the next week he was not interested? (when he was the week before) I am just trying to ascertain where my marriage is headed, as I won’t leave.

Best answer:

Answer by cateyes
Didn’t I just answer this a couple of hours ago?

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!




For more Job or Interview Question/Answers Results enter New Search in box below

Custom Search

Powered by WordPress Search provided by Google and YouTube Powered by YahooAnswers.com Sitemap fairy stickers | review pundit